VACCINATION EXEMPTION CARDS

Some Background information:

On the 13th of July 2021, the MP’s in UK Parliament voted by 319 votes to 246 to make the experimental so-called “vaccinations” mandatory for care home workers, before any impact assessment had been published, and where according to the Governments own Yellow card reporting scheme, that is believed to only account for a small percentage of actual cases there has been 1,102,228 adverse reactions as of the 1st of August 2021 (and rising), including heart inflammation, bell’s palsy, blindness, blood clots, anaphylaxis, menstrual disorders and the list goes on and on with approximately 1,517 Deaths that have been reported as caused by this unorthodox experimental mRNAs altering “Frankenstein” gene therapy;

Most reassuringly the Health minister Helen Whately told MP’s:

“the impact assessment is being worked on”

The Government have been criticised for not publishing an impact assessment of the policy before the vote, however, despite this fact, The House of Commons and its “Most Honourable” representatives of the people still went ahead and approved the draft Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2021, which had been laid before the House on 22 June 2021, to force and compel care home workers to comply;

The US Supreme Court ruled on the 15th of April 2013, that people vaccinated with these experimental mRNAs altering gene therapies worldwide are now “products”and “patented goods” who would belong to the holder of the modified GEN vaccination patent and as such, according to US law are no longer human and do not have any Human rights;

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7b1.pdf

When all people vaccinated with GM-modified mRNA’s are legally trans-human and legally identified as trans-human they do not enjoy any human or other rights of a state, and this applies worldwide because GEN-POINT technology patents are under the jurisdiction and laws of the US, where they were registered;

However, what these so-call “Most Honourable” representatives of the people forgot was that: Vaccines in the UK cannot be made mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self-certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 – https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf

Another current document (Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008)) describes a basic model of partnership between doctor and patient:

“The doctor explains the options to the patient, setting out the potential benefits, risks, burdens and side effects of each option, including the option to have no treatment. The doctor may recommend a particular option which they believe to be best for the patient, but they must not put pressure on the patient to accept their advice. The patient weighs up the potential benefits, risks and burdens of the various options as well as any non-clinical issues that are relevant to them. The patient decides whether to accept any of the options and, if so, which one.”

The Official NHS website https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/  it states on Consent to Treatment:

“Consent to treatment means a person must give permission before they receive any type of medical treatment, test or examination”.

This must be done on the basis of an explanation by a clinician.

Consent from a patient is needed regardless of the procedure,

whether it’s a physical examination, organ donation or something else. The Principle of consent is an important part of medical ethics and international human rights law;

Various International Laws (that are the highest man-made laws) must be obeyed by all signatories including (but not limited to) the Nuremberg Code (1947)categorically state that:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment;

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity”;

So with the above being stated you have to wonder how is it possible that a group of self-serving MP’s can blatantly breach your rights of informed consent and breach international law?

Any draft “act” of Parliament is known as a bill, that needs to be discussed in parliament before it can be passed;

Most bills that have any possibility of becoming law [by-laws of Corporations] are introduced into parliament by the government. This will usually happen following the publication of a white paper, setting out the issues and the way in which the proposed new law is intended to deal with them. A bill may also be introduced into parliament without formal government backing; this is known as a private members bill;

First reading [Speaking it “into life”]: the MP’s debate and vote on the Bill. If it’s approved, it passes to the…

Second reading: The select committee consider the Bill and hears public submissions on the matter…

Third reading: A debate on the final text of the bill, as amended in the House of Lords and further amendments may be tabled at this stage…

The next stage is called “Passage” where the Bill is sent to the other House (to the Lords, if it originated in the Commons; to the Commons, if it is a Lords bill), where it may be further amended. It then enters the “Consideration” stage where the House in where the bill originated considers the amendments made in the other House;

Finally the Bill is given Royal assent and is passed with any amendments and becomes an “Act of Parliament” and the Bill is then given to the Public!

All they are doing is an administrative process on you!

At the Second reading, the select committee hears “Public submissions” on the matter…

If at this stage you didn’t say “No”, then you just said “Yes” by “Acquiescence” ie the acceptance of something without protest;

So with that said: Why not do [a] simply Administrative back on them?

If you start shouting “I do not consent” then, they like to label you as a tin foil hat wearing, belligerent “Conspiracy theorist”;

So don’t refuse to have the vaccination… Do exactly what they have done to us, [a] simple four (4) step administrative process: