Download the Free Data Subject Access Request or copy it from this page and send it to: The Data Comptroller at the Office of Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. They have been telling us for God knows how long now that there is this “Plandemic”, isn’t it time we asked them for the proof that Sars-Cov-19 actually exists???
For all you “Natural Persons” “living men and women” out there, The Data Subject Request (DSAR) is sent from your LEGAL PERSON (an implied, unincorporated, Company / Corporation) because you are sending it to another Corporation. So in order to communicate with them, you send it, Company to Company (exactly as set out below);
However, you will be signing the DSAR “by accommodation” this is the living man/ woman known as the “Natural Person” signing on behalf of the LEGAL PERSON, thereby “accommodating” the LEGAL FICTION (that can’t sign for itself) in the same way [a] Company director signs documents for and on behalf of the “Company”, of which; your LEGAL PERSON is, you the “Natural Person” are signing for and on behalf of the LEGAL FICTION, in the capacity of the Authorised Representative (so please do Not change the format and sign in your normal signature)…
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
MR/S JOHN HENRY DOE [USE ALL CAPS – THE CORPORATION – Legal Fiction Name ]
32 The Street,
Somewhere,
Any Town
[POST CODE]
To: The Data Comptroller Department of Health and Social Care
39 Victoria Street
London
SW1H 0EU
Our Ref: JHD/DSAR/101-1 [NOTE: First three (3) characters are your “PERSONS” initials]
Date: XX-XX-2021
DATA SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST
Dear Sirs,
I require full disclosure in writing and by electronic means in a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear plain language, without undue delay and in any event, before the end of the applicable time period of thirty (30) days under the Rights of subject access pursuant to both Article fifteen (15) and twenty (20) of the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and s.45/ s.94 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) so that I may consider the possible vaccination side effects, as listed on the MHRA Yellow Card Reporting Scheme;
The information I require, whilst not exhaustive is as follows:
1: Empirical evidence and proof (if any) that the Status of COVID-19, has been reclassified as a “High Consequence Infectious Disease” (HCID) since it was downgraded by the Official Government website (See https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid#status- of-covid-19) as of the 19 March 2020;
2: Proof (if any) that the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should now be reclassified as an HCID;
3: Empirical scientific evidence (if any) that proves that SARS CoV-2 has been scientifically isolated and proven to exist using the Koch’s postulates, where the sample was taken directly from one (1) single symptomatic patient with covid-19, where the sample was not combined or mixed with any other source of genetic material (such as: Monkey kidney, cancer cells, HIV virus, etc) thereby eliminating contamination and alternative sources of sampling;
4: Empirical scientific evidence (if any) that proves that the “Delta” variant or any other variant strains can be isolated, and proven to exist again using the Koch’s postulates, where the sample was taken directly from one (1) single symptomatic patient with covid-19, where the sample was not combined or mixed with any other source of genetic material (such as: Monkey kidney, cancer cells, HIV virus, etc) thereby eliminating contamination and alternative sources of sampling;
5: Provide referenced scientific proof (if any) that proves that face masks are safe and work to stop the transmission of Covid-19;
6: Provide referenced scientific proof (if any) that proves that contact tracing prevents the spread of Covid-19 or any other purported virus;
7: Provide referenced scientific proof (if any) that proves that lock downs prevents the spread of Covid-19 or any other purported virus;
8: Provide referenced scientific proof (if any) that proves that social distancing prevents the spread of Covid-19 or any other purported virus;
9: Provide referenced scientific proof (if any) that the Covid-19 “vaccines” provide immunity and prevents transmission of “Covid-19”;
10: Provide proof (if any) that informed consent of the human subject is not required prior to receiving any experimental vaccinations;
11: Provide proof that forced mandatory vaccinations are not in breach of the Nuremberg Code (1947) that clearly states: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”;
12: Provide proof (if any) that the ruling made by the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015], where it recognised at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self-certified medical reason, can be over ruled by any legislative act of parliament, where the three-hundred and nineteen (319) ‘Uninformed’ MP’s voted to make experimental vaccinations ‘mandatory’ for care home workers, without even seeing the impact assessment, which according to the Health minister Helen Whately was “being worked on”, and before sometime in 2023, when the medical trials are scheduled for completion;
13: Provide proof that the Gillick Competence test can be used for anyone (let alone a legal minor), to make an informed decision, and to understand the implications of those decisions, as to whether to have an experimental vaccination, that are currently only in “emergency use”, and where any possible side effects and Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease are currently unknown until testing is concluded sometime in 2023;
14: Provide [a] copy of the Department of Health and Social Cares Public liability insurance (should I need to make any claim, as vaccine manufactures have been given exemption from any liability);
15: If for whatever reason, the Department of Health and Social Care do not have or cannot provide the above mentioned referenced empirical scientific evidence, then you are duly obliged to inform me, who has this information and where it can be located;
Take Notice: Pursuant to s.148(2)(a)(b) and s.173(3) of the Data Protection Act 2018, “It is an offence for a person listed in subsection (4) to alter, deface, block, erase, destroy or conceal information with the intention of preventing disclosure of all or part of the information that the person making the request would have been entitled to receive”;
Pursuant to s.96, I do not consent to automated decision making that may significantly affect my rights as an individual affecting the data subject that is based solely on automated processing of personal data;
Interpretation Clause:
The present Notice shall be liberally construed to effect a prompt, accurate and full disclosure in response to the above-mentioned required items and the controller shall not refuse to act on the request of the data subject for exercising his or her rights under Articles 15 to 22 (GDPR);
Binding Clause:
It is expected that if there is any impediment to you effecting this Notice, you shall make immediate written contact for clarification. Otherwise, any absence of response shall be reasonably construed as your understanding and binding obligation to reply as required;
Severability Clause:
In the event that any above-mentioned required item is held to be invalid or unenforceable at law, such item shall hereby be severed from the present notice to the extent that such request is void, or invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, any such ruling or action shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the above-mentioned required items;
Fees:
Information provided under Articles 13 and 14 and any communication and any actions taken under Articles 15 to 22 and 34 shall be provided free of charge. Where requests from a data subject are manifestly unfounded or excessive, in particular because of their repetitive character, the controller may either: (a) charge a reasonable fee taking into account the administrative costs of providing the information or communication or taking the action requested; or (b) refuse to act on the request. The controller shall bear the burden of demonstrating the manifestly unfounded or excessive character of the request;
As I am sure you are aware, under current legislative guidelines as set out by the aforementioned acts and the Information Commissioners Office (I.C.O.) you now have a maximum mandatory period of thirty (30) days to comply and send the required information;
This communication has been sent without prejudice by way of Recorded signed for Delivery, so I can ensure compliance on these issues within the legislative time frames and furthermore, is not [a] complaint and is not to be treated as such;
Yours Sincerely
By accommodation
< Sign – Normal “chequebook” signature Here>
All Rights Reserved – U.C.C. 1-308
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Please Note: This DSAR is to be used for the Department of Health and Social Care. Our other DSAR’s that are in the other document packs, contain other/ different questions. eg. the Schools pack contains specific questions in relation to the use of the “Gillick Competence Test”…]